top of page

INQUIRY: WEAVING THE WEB

MULTIPLE TENSIONS BETWEEN PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL SAFETY AND DANGER IN THE SECONDARY DRAMA CLASSROOM

THE NAME GAME

BLOG


I am comfortable with alternative forms of research dissemination. Prose, script, dance, sculpture: I think they are all valid and powerful ways of interpreting and sharing research. Despite this, a blog still seems alien and perhaps too casual a medium for me to share my final inquiry project. In the name of challenge, I am embracing arts-based research and alternative forms of research dissemination and sharing my meditation on safety and danger in the drama classroom through academic prose, poetry, and reflection on this blog.



Introductions.


My name is Simone Brodie and I am a Drama and Language Arts educator currently completing my BEd at UBC. My inquiry question is an attempt to excavate the way in which the drama classroom serves as a site of multiple tensions between physical and emotional safety and danger.  One the one hand, drama classrooms often serve as a site within the school where students can find refuge from the larger heteronormative school culture. This sense of emotional safety created by theatre’s traditionally accepting space is contrasted with the emotional vulnerability and risk taking necessary for meaningful creative drama work. Contemporaneously, the drama classroom serves as a site where both physical safety and danger are negotiated.  Our increasingly litigious society dictates that the physical safety of the students is of the utmost importance.  At the same time, drama class requires that students take physical risk in activities such as trust exercises, stage combat, circus exercises, or general drama movement.  Regardless of whether teachers actively recognize this, these intersecting tensions between physical and emotional safety and danger are necessary within any effective drama pedagogy. 

Wool Threads

STRINGS

White butcher’s twine to show a lack of blood. How clean.

Green garden twine

- coloured to hide amongst the growing things.

Silver thread shimmering upon his silk Kimono. How beautiful.

Red ribbon

– came off a present but now they tie their hair with it.  

Shoe laces dusted with exhaust and city.


I feel the intersectionality of identity

Mirrored in the intersection of strings

Criss-cross (apple sauce)

Pulling.

Pushing.


Emotional -                                                                        -  Physical

                      \                                               /

                          - Safety----Danger -

                     /                                    \

   Physical -                                            - Emotional


----------------------------------------

My classroom some ever dancing marionette

WHERE DOES THIS CONVERSATION SIT?

This past September, the University of Chicago sent a letter to each of its incoming students: “Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called trigger warnings…and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own” (qtd. in Yakabuski). This letter, written by John Ellison, the Dean of Students at U of C, initiated a firestorm of debate about the benefits and detriments of “safe spaces” in educational settings. Although most of the attention surrounding the topic of “safe spaces” is focused on post-secondary education where the demand and push-back has been most fierce, secondary education has not been free from this debate. As a beginning educator who identifies education as a powerful means of supporting social justice in our present and future societies, I have watched the “safe space” debate unfold with disbelief and trepidation about the future of my own classrooms.

As with most beginner teacher inquiry, the motivation for this research largely springs from my own concern about what kind of culture I will bring to my future classrooms, or, in other words, how I can possibly attempt to enact all of my pedagogical, creative, and social justice ideals within my teaching practice. However, beyond this, there are numerous more personal and intellectual reasons motivating this line of inquiry.

As well as the aforementioned debate about “safe spaces” at the post-secondary level, this topic has also swept through secondary schools. Beyond the rainbow stickers that designate that classroom as a “safe-space” for LGBTQ students, or the plethora of gay-straight alliances in high schools that sit somewhere on the spectrum between activist group and safe space, there are also two schools: Harvey Milk School in New York City, and Alliance in Milwaukee. These schools (and often the GSA) create safety through segregation. Beyond the discomfort evoked by the idea of segregated education, critics of these schools suggest that by removing students from the mainstream system, we are allowing the homophobia of the average school to continue. Proponents of these schools  remind us that “Trying to fix a problem like bullying by forcing students to go through a bad experience is a bad approach” (Calefati).

Just as I am pondering how to engage my students while also fostering a classroom culture that is safe and supportive of all students regardless of race, gender, sexuality, ability, religion, or socioeconomic status, I am also aware of the various safe and unsafe digital spaces that out students inhabit. Especially after Donald Trump’s win, some of our students may find themselves in the many online spaces that support and normalize violence against women or minority groups. With this in mind, my question of how to negotiate social justice education without further alienating


Calefati, Jessica. "Gay High Schools Offer a Haven From Bullies." US News and World     Report. N.p., 31 Dec. 2008. Web. 5 Dec. 2016.

Yakabuski, Konrad. "On Campus, It’s Good to Be Bothered by a Diversity of Ideas." The   Globe and Mail. N.p., 5 Sept. 2016. Web. 1 Dec. 2016.

ROCKSLIDE/FLOOD

I think about Carl – “to live, to teach, to exist

Poetically.”


When I think of this, I imagine a poem about a tulip.

Each one of my students:

Pigment, verdant water, possibility.


The responsibility of being and educator is so tremendous

So crushing

I put it out of my mind.


But then in the middle of lesson planning

The rocks come tumbling down,

Sending echoes, dust, and choking fear through the cavities of my mind and chest.

At the same time, clean tears well up from my toenails.

Sweet and cool, with thankfulness.

How lucky I am, how shatteringly lucky

To have this responsibility.

Pebble Beach

WHAT DOES THE LITERATURE SAY?

Despite the relevance of “safe-space” discussion within the media, there has been relatively little written from the perspective of the secondary school educator, and even less from an arts education perspective. Most articles that I encountered focused on post-secondary education, and nearly all dismissed the need for safe spaces. While post-secondary education is dramatically different from secondary education (the students are adults rather than children, the students are enrolling and paying to attend, the students may not be so actively negotiating their developing identities in relation to their peers), there are numerous lessons that can be learned from these articles. In “No Safe Space: James Arnt Aune and the Controversial Classroom”, Stob reminisces on the professor and academic Aune who suggested that “Classrooms should be unsafe spaces” (qtd. in Stob, 555). Aune’s pedagogy was inspired by the idea that “rhetoric remains our only real alternative to violence.” (558), and the ability to debate difficult issues is necessary for adults to fulfill their civic duties. I am taken the notion of the classroom as a place to learn civic responsibilities, but wonder if this would work when the students are worried if they will be pushed or beaten up after school for sharing their opinions in my classroom.

            While Stob’s discussion of safety and danger is powerful, anecdotal, and more inspirational than practical, Stengel’s article: “The Complex Case of Fear and Safe Space” provides a highly useful theoretical framework that can easily be applied to the secondary classroom. In this article, Stengel is critical of the practice of creating “safe spaces” through segregation. Through an analysis of Dewey and Ahmed's theories on the emotion and affect of fear, Stengel suggests that the students who call for safe spaces are rarely the ones that need them, and that marginalized groups are made marginalized through fear, or as Dewey puts it, “organic shrinkage” (529) on the part of the more privileged individual. Last but not least, Stengel reminds us that, while students cannot learn or succeed if they are deeply oppressed by their surrounding environment, some discomfort is necessary for education to occur.

            Although the previous two articles outline a comprehensive overview of the pedagogical complexity of safety and danger in the classroom, neither provide the necessary background on the phenomenon of safe spaces to understand when and why students and teachers have begun to call for safe spaces within their educational settings. Rosenfeld and Noterman’s “Safe Space: Towards a Reconceptualization”, provides a thorough history of “safe spaces”, and as the title suggests, a reconceptualization of these spaces as often reinforcing a binary of “safe” and “unsafe”. Indeed, much like Stengel’s interest in fear as the impetus behind the creation of safe space, Rosenfeld and Noterman identify how our society conceptualizes “unsafe spaces”. However, the most useful section within this article came within a discussion of “Inclusive” safe space in the classroom
: “By acknowledging that “no space is free from domination” or risk, teachers and students can constructively explore how issues of privilege, power and difference play out in the classroom and in the larger socio-political realm” (1355). Indeed, this conceptualization of “safe spaces” in the classroom, however impractical and difficult for teachers to successfully enact, echoes noted Drama Education scholar Jo Beth Gonzalez’ idea of a “critically conscious production oriented classroom” (1). Gonzalez suggests that in fostering a democratic classroom where students are working together to create a final production, teachers do not need to enforce social justice education, but simply must be present to facilitate a critical discussion amongst the students when issues of race, class, sexuality, religion, ability inevitably arise.

Gonzalez, Jo Beth. "What Is a Critically Conscious Production-Oriented Classroom?" Temporary Stages: Departing from Tradition in High School Theatre Education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2006. 1-23. Print.


Rosenfeld, Heather, and Elsa Noterman. "Safe Space: Towards aReconceptualization."Antipode 46.5 (2014): 1346-365. Wiley Online Library. Web. 28 Nov. 2016.

Stengel, Barbara S. "The Complex Case of Fear and Safe Space." Studies in Philosophy      and Education 29.6 (2010): 523-40. SpringerLink. Web. 8 Dec. 2016.


Stob, Paul. "No Safe Space: James Arnt Aune and the Controversial Classroom." Rhetoric and Public Affairs 16.3 (2013): 555. Project MUSE [Johns Hopkins UP]. Web. 6 Dec. 2016.

Breads

SUSPENSION

Suspension



“We have to take our socks off as well?”

Clumps of wet flour in the bowl

They hesitate to form a circle.

Terrified to incorporate,

To open,

To be.

To be, perchance to dream,

Without the safety of a desk.


“We need to have bare feet in this class,

Because we will be doing a lot of movement,

And this floor can be slippery in socks.”


I’ve never been afraid of spiders.

They arrive in the fall,

with school.

Their homes, damp corners of my home.

Misty October mornings

Shimmering webs.


Abject.

Witchcraft.

I’m entranced by her grace

In design, in science,

As she births silver silk,

Warp

Weft

Into beautiful tensions.

Into beautiful suspension

 of disbelief.

Not too dangerous.

The school is dangerous enough.

I am dedicated to critical pedagogy.

We live in a litigious society and don’t want our students hurt.

Creative work can’t take place if our students don’t feel safe.

Learning can’t take place if our students don’t feel safe.

Safe is not enough.


Not too safe.

The Socratic method works.

Set the bar high and students will rise to the challenge.

Student artists must learn to be vulnerable to create.

Student artists must take physical risks to improve.

Creative work can’t take place if our students aren’t pushed to take real risks.

Learning can’t take place if our students are comfortable.

“rhetoric remains our only real alternative to violence.” (Stob, 2013, pg. 558)


I watch their eyes.

They look at my naked feet.

They look at their classmates naked feet.

Slowly, fearfully, they remove their socks,

Testing the varnished wood on their bare souls.


And I, with my twelve watchful eyes,

Attempt to weave a web,

Bake a bread,

With enough tension and yeast;


Safe enough to stay suspended

Risk enough to rise.

Paint Abstract Blue

IT'S NOT ALWAYS WHAT WE EXPECT

In reality:


At my practicum school, there were far fewer negotiations around power and sexuality than I expected. This is because, as far as I know, I did not have a single student in any of my classes that was openly out and queer. Instead, I learned that the negotiations of safety and danger largely focused on issues of gendered power. I was shocked to see how much power male-identifying students had in every class I taught, from Drama 8, to Humanities 8, to Theatre 11, to English 12. In this way, although the focus of my classes was still based on creating a safe enough space for every single one of my students to thrive, I was much more occupied with ensuring gender parity in class discussion than fostering queer students to express themselves. Although they were not in my classes, I do know of a few students within the school who were out, and were beyond confident. In this way, I realize how complicated power dynamics within the classroom can be. I focused on issues of sexuality because I believed that this would be the most contentious and most contemporary issue. Instead, I found that it was still issues of gender and popularity that were determining power within my classroom. I wonder how this might be different at different schools. My school was decidedly upper-middle class. I wonder what it would be like at an inner city school?

A HIGHSCHOOL IS A HIGHSCHOOL

A highschool is a highschool:

metal lockers

echo laughter,

boredom;

Re/verb a love of one subject,

hate tears over another.


Pull open the heavy doors

and everyday

do your best to help them,

staggering and stumbling

over

the responsibilities of being

alive.

bottom of page